第 1 句
Madrid was hailed as a public health guiding light last November when it rolled out ambitious restrictions on the most polluting cars.
被誉为
推出
高污染汽车
去年十一月,马德里推出针对污染最严重汽车的大胆限制措施时,曾被誉为公共卫生领域的榜样。
从马德里政策反复与伦敦超低排放区出发,讨论城市空气治理的局限。
注意作者肯定城市行动,但强调应由国家层面约束汽车制造商。
Madrid was hailed as a public health guiding light last November when it rolled out ambitious restrictions on the most polluting cars.
被誉为
推出
高污染汽车
去年十一月,马德里推出针对污染最严重汽车的大胆限制措施时,曾被誉为公共卫生领域的榜样。
Seven months and one election day later, a new conservative city council suspended enforcement of the clean air zone, a first step toward its possible termination.
暂停执行
清洁空气区
终止
七个月和一次选举之后,新上台的保守派市议会暂停执行清洁空气区规定,这可能是最终废除该区的第一步。
Mayor José Luis Martinez-Almeida made opposition to the zone a centrepiece of his election campaign, despite its success in improving air quality.
核心组成部分
尽管它取得成功
尽管清洁空气区成功改善了空气质量,市长何塞·路易斯·马丁内斯-阿尔梅达仍把反对该区作为竞选的核心议题。
A judge has now overruled the city’s decision to stop levying fines, ordering them restored.
推翻裁决
征收罚款
恢复
如今,一名法官推翻了市政府停止罚款的决定,命令恢复征收罚款。
But with legal battles ahead, the zone’s future looks uncertain at best.
充其量
未来的法律争斗
但法律争斗仍在前方,清洁空气区的未来充其量也只能说不确定。
Madrid’s back and forth on clean air is a pointed reminder of the limits to the patchwork, city-by-city approach that characterises efforts on air pollution across Europe, Britain very much included.
反复摇摆
各城各自为政的拼凑式办法
鲜明提醒
马德里在清洁空气政策上反复摇摆,鲜明地提醒我们:欧洲各地(英国也不例外)逐城施策、拼凑式应对空气污染的方法有其局限。
Among other weaknesses, the measures cities must employ when left to tackle dirty air on their own are politically controversial, and therefore vulnerable.
独自应对空气污染
脆弱的
这种做法的缺陷之一是:当城市被迫独自应对脏空气时,可采用的措施在政治上颇具争议,因而也很脆弱。
That’s because they inevitably put the costs of cleaning the air on to individual drivers—who must pay fees or buy better vehicles—rather than on to the car manufacturers whose cheating is the real cause of our toxic pollution.
把成本转嫁给个人司机
汽车制造商
有毒污染
这是因为这些措施不可避免地把净化空气的成本转嫁给个人驾驶者——他们得交费或买更环保的车——而不是转嫁给作弊造假、造成有毒污染的汽车制造商。
It’s not hard to imagine a similar reversal happening in London.
类似的政策逆转
设想
不难想象伦敦也会出现类似的政策逆转。
The new ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) is likely to be a big issue in next year’s mayoral election.
超低排放区
市长选举
新的超低排放区很可能成为明年市长选举中的重大议题。
And if Sadiq Khan wins and extends it to the North and South Circular roads in 2021 as he intends, it is sure to spark intense opposition from the far larger number of motorists who will then be affected.
引发强烈反对
开车的人
将它扩展到
如果萨迪克·汗获胜,并按计划在 2021 年把该区扩展至南北环路,届时受影响的驾驶者人数将大幅增加,势必引发强烈反对。
It’s not that measures such as London’s Ulez are useless.
不是说……毫无用处
措施
这并不是说伦敦超低排放区一类措施毫无用处。
Far from it.
恰恰相反
指无用这一说法
事实恰恰相反。
Local officials are using the levers that are available to them to safeguard residents’ health in the face of a serious threat.
利用政策杠杆
保护居民健康
面对严重威胁,地方官员正利用手头可用的政策工具保护居民健康。
The zones do deliver some improvements to air quality, and the science tells us that means real health benefits.
确实带来
真正的健康益处
这些区域确实在一定程度上改善了空气质量,科学证据表明这会带来切实的健康益处。
But mayors and councillors can only do so much about a problem that is far bigger than any one city or town.
所能做的有限
地方议员
但面对远超一城一镇范围的问题,市长和地方议员能做的终究有限。
They are acting because national governments—Britain’s and others across Europe—have failed to do so.
未能有所作为
中央政府
他们之所以采取行动,是因为英国和欧洲其他国家的中央政府未能有所作为。
Restrictions that keep highly polluting cars out of certain areas—city centres, “school streets”, even individual roads—are a response to the absence of a larger effort to properly enforce existing regulations and require auto companies to bring their vehicles into compliance.
使汽车符合规定
执行现有法规
学校附近限制车辆进入的街道
限制高污染汽车进入市中心、“学校街道”甚至单条道路,是对更大范围政策缺位的回应:中央政府没有切实执行现有法规,也没有要求车企让汽车符合排放规定。
Wales has introduced special low speed limits to minimise pollution.
限速
减轻污染
威尔士已推出特殊的低速限速措施以减少污染。
We’re doing everything but insist that manufacturers clean up their cars.
唯独没有坚持要求
解决汽车污染问题
除了坚持要求汽车制造商清理车辆污染,我们几乎什么都做了。
将以下链接复制到你的 RSS 阅读器(如 Feedly、Inoreader、Reeder)中即可订阅博客更新。