第 1 句
When it was established, the National Health Service (NHS) was visionary: offering high-quality, timely care to meet the dominant needs of the population it served.
英国国家医疗服务体系
富有远见的
主要需求
英国国家医疗服务体系刚建立时具有前瞻性:它及时提供优质医疗,满足当时人群的主要健康需求。
从医院中心模式的局限出发,讨论社会健康因素和医疗资源的分配。
抓住“增进国民健康”与“修补医疗机构”之间的视角差别。
When it was established, the National Health Service (NHS) was visionary: offering high-quality, timely care to meet the dominant needs of the population it served.
英国国家医疗服务体系
富有远见的
主要需求
英国国家医疗服务体系刚建立时具有前瞻性:它及时提供优质医疗,满足当时人群的主要健康需求。
Nearly 75 years on, with the UK facing very different health challenges, it is clear that model is out of date.
七十五年后
过时的
近七十五年过去了,英国如今面临截然不同的健康挑战,这一模式显然已经过时。
From life expectancy to cancer and infant mortality rates, we are lagging behind many of our peers.
预期寿命
婴儿死亡率
落后于
从预期寿命到癌症和婴儿死亡率等指标,英国都落后于许多同类国家。
With more than 6.8 million on waitlists, healthcare is becoming increasingly inaccessible for those who cannot opt to pay for private treatment; and the cost of providing healthcare is increasingly squeezing out investment in other public services.
候诊名单
挤占投资
私人医疗
超过六百八十万人在等候名单上;对无力自费接受私人治疗的人来说,医疗服务越来越难获得,而且医疗费用正日益挤占其他公共服务的投资。
As demand for healthcare continues to grow, pressures on the workforce—which is already near breaking point—will only become more acute.
接近承受极限
更严峻的
随着医疗需求持续增长,原已接近崩溃边缘的医护人员将面临更严峻的压力。
Many of the answers to the crisis in health and care are well rehearsed.
已反复讨论过的
医疗与照护危机
应对医疗与照护危机的许多办法早已被反复提及。
We need to be much better at reducing and diverting demand on health services, rather than simply managing it.
分流需求
而不只是管理需求
我们需要更有效地减少并分流对医疗服务的需求,而不是仅仅管理已有需求。
Much more needs to be invested in communities and primary care to reduce our reliance on hospitals.
初级保健
对医院的依赖
应在社区和初级保健投入更多资金,减少对医院的依赖。
And capacity in social care needs to be greater, to support the growing number of people living with long-term conditions.
社会照护
长期健康问题
社会照护能力也需要加强,以支持越来越多患有长期疾病的人。
Yet despite two decades of strategies and a number of major health reforms, we have failed to make meaningful progress on any of these aims.
实质性进展
重大医疗改革
然而,经历了二十年的战略制定和多次重大医疗改革,我们在这些目标上都未取得实质进展。
That is why the Reform think tank is launching a new programme of work entitled “Reimagining health”, supported by ten former health ministers.
智库
题为……的
因此,获得十名前卫生大臣支持的改革智库正推出一项名为“重新构想健康”的新工作计划。
Together, we are calling for a much more open and honest conversation about the future of health in the UK, and an “urgent rethink” of the hospital-centric model we retain.
以医院为中心的模式
紧急重新思考
我们共同呼吁就英国医疗的未来展开更开放、诚实的讨论,并“紧急重新思考”目前仍维持的医院中心模式。
This must begin with the question of how we maximise the health of the nation, rather than “fix” the NHS.
最大限度提升国民健康
而非仅仅修补
首先要问的应该是如何最大限度增进国民健康,而不是如何“修补”国家医疗服务体系。
It is estimated, for example, that healthcare accounts for only about 20% of health outcomes.
仅占约百分之二十
健康结果
例如,据估计,医疗服务对健康结果的贡献只有约百分之二十。
Much more important are the places we live, work and socialise—yet there is no clear cross-government strategy for improving these social determinants of health.
健康的社会决定因素
跨政府部门战略
更重要的是我们生活、工作与社交的环境;然而,政府各部门并无明确的跨部门战略来改善这些健康的社会决定因素。
Worse, when policies like the national obesity strategy are scrapped, taxpayers are left with the heavy price tag of treating the illnesses, like diabetes, that result.
被废除
高昂代价
纳税人
更糟的是,国家肥胖治理战略一类政策一旦被废除,纳税人就得承担治疗糖尿病等后续疾病的高昂费用。
Reform wants to ask how power and resources should be distributed in our health system.
分配
权力和资源
改革智库希望提出一个问题:卫生系统中的权力与资源应如何分配?
What health functions should remain at the centre, and what should be given to local leaders, often responsible for services that create health, and with a much better understanding of the needs of their populations?
保留在中央
地方领导者
哪些卫生职能应留在中央,哪些应交由地方领导者负责?他们通常负责有助于促进健康的服务,也更了解本地居民的需求。
将以下链接复制到你的 RSS 阅读器(如 Feedly、Inoreader、Reeder)中即可订阅博客更新。